Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα english articles. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα english articles. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Παρασκευή 12 Οκτωβρίου 2012

I AM HERE TO STAY



Last night, I went to go see Corpus Christi. The reason I wanted to go and see this particular play was my desire to support the right of artists to freedom of expression. I never imagined I would face so many difficulties and dangers in this simple task.

I took the subway, got off at Kerameikos Station, and walked from Konstantinoupoleos Street towards Iera Odos, where the theater is located.  From the previous intersection, I could see that a large crowd had gathered and the special forces of the police had blocked off the street. I turned right and made my way to Iera Odos from the previous street.  In front of the theater, another crowd had gathered, and another group of policemen was preventing them for approaching.  Behind the police, there were a few people, priests, monks, a lady with a scarf on her head and some men in suits, three of which, as I learned later, were parliament members of the Golden Dawn party.

The air smelled of tear gas and my eyes stung, but generally there was relative calm. I approached the officers and said that I wanted to enter the theater.

“Go away, ma'm. Please, go away”
“Has the play been cancelled?”
“We don’t know. Please step back.”

I did step back, but I didn’t leave. I tried, in vain, to locate my friends with whom we had arranged to meet. I walked around the ring of police officers, trying to get through, all the while explaining that I wanted to enter the theater to see the show, but without success.  My efforts, and the Atheist Union t-shirt I was wearing, attracted the attention of protesters who started to comment:

“What does she want? To see the play?”
“She's a lesbian and wants to see the fags?”
“Look at her t-shirt! Atheist Union!”
“She's an atheist!”

Their interest turned onto me and they started talking, their words mostly full of tension: logical fallacies, insults and threats.  I tried to stay calm and steady, to respond rationally and coolly, and to engage the others, and while I succeeded, I can not say the same thing for them. I will try to convey some of the comments here, somewhat out of order, because I can no longer remember exactly who said what, with a few exceptions.

“Go away, you fucking commie!”
“Why did you come? To see the fags? What are you, a lesbian?”
“It’s none of your business.”
“She's a lesbian, don't you see? You have no man with you, no children, no grandchildren, you're a lesbian!”
“Look at the t-shirt, she's an atheist! Get the hell outta here!”
“I want to see the play.”
“You want to see the faggots? They're faggots! Perverts!”
“They swear against our Christ, our Virgin Mary!”
“How do you know? Have you seen it?”
“No, but so they told me. They told me it swears against our Christ. It must be banned!”
“If you don't want to see the play, don't. Why shouldn't I?”
“They blaspheme against our God! We have the one true God!”
“He'll strike you down with lightning and burn you! You’ll see what God will do to you!”
“Since God will do it, why are you worrying about it? Go home, rest, and trust in God.”
“You’ll go to Hell!”
“There is no God, nor is there a Hell.”
“There isn't? Then I won't talk to you, you're not worth it.”
“I want to talk to you. I believe you are worth it.”
“Hey, don’t waste your time on her, she’s not worth it.  She’s trash.”
“Get out of here, Albanian!”
“I'm Greek.”
“Greek? True Greeks don't do such things! You're Albanian!”
“You're trash! May God have mercy on you.”
“Is this the religion of love?”
“Christ threw out the merchants from his house with a whip!  That’s how we’re going to throw you out!”
“This isn’t a church, this is a theater. You are stopping us, not the other way around.”
“Christ said, “I did not come to bring love, but a sword”. He said, “Bring me my enemies, and slay them before me!””
“In other words, you want to slay me?”
“Listen here, bitch, we are Greek Christian fascists! 90% of Greeks are Christian fascists, understand?  As a fascist, i have the right to tell you to get out of here.”
“As a fascist, you have the strength, but not the right.”

More  shouting, more insults, more irrationality. Blind rage and hate, hate speech full of bile.
You need to get laid, you're not properly laid, you’re a woman and you need a spanking, would that Papadopoulos were back... The women seemed to be more fanatic.  Most were middle aged, but there were both older and younger women there.  The woman with the scarf on her head, near the MPs, was one of the most angry ones. When she spoke to me, she stood so close to me that I could feel her saliva on my face. I told her many times, very calmly:

“Please step back a little. Please, speak more slowly, so that I can hear you better.”

It was no use, nor could I reason with the gentleman who claimed that we are "90% Christian fascists."

“Speak more slowly, please. I can’t hear well like this.”
“I have a strong voice!”

I wish I could tell them: I am not a lesbian, but even if I were, what would it matter? I have a husband and a child, but even if I didn’t, what would it matter? I'm not Albanian, but even if I was, what would it matter? I’m not a communist, but even if I was, what would it matter? I don’t believe in God, but what does it matter? Some people have a different opinion about God and Christ and the Virgin Mary -- what does it matter? You demand respect for your right to believe in God as you like, why don’t you respect others’ rights to believe in a different way, or not to believe at all?

In the meantime, the ring of police had loosened.  I tried to approach the theater again.  Through the gate, I saw a man coming toward us. I assumed it was someone involved with the play that had come to open up to let the audience in. I started to speak to him, but a tall, fat, bulky man -- someone told me later that he was Ilias Panayotaros, a Golden Dawn MP -- came toward me and told me to leave.

‘I don't want to leave, I want to see the play.”
“Get outta here, you fuckin' lesbian, you fuckin' commie, or I'll smack you!”

It was impossible to go around him.  He pushed me with his body, stepping towards me, forcing me to retreat.  Another man who was with him and approached me and he pushed me as well, both physically and verbally.  He leaned over me and pushed me with his body. People around me encouraged me to leave.

“Get out of here, now, or you'll get beat up, don't you see what's going on here?”
“I don't want to leave. I won't submit to violence. I have a right to be here. I have a right to see the play.”

I tried to stand my ground. I tried to talk with the others, but to no end.  The theater stayed closed with the police in front. My friends were nowhere to be seen. I wanted to stay calm, but I felt upset, more and  more lonely and tired. After a little while, I went to stand by a kiosk, a few meters from the entrance. I walked towards the back, in between the magazines and the potato chips. Another couple was there who had come to see the show and had fled, like me, for the safety of the kiosk.  I had a calm, logical and coherent chat with them.  Their presence helped me.  Soon I felt better, my heart heartbeat came back to normal.

We talked a bit, commenting on bigotry blind fanaticism. We wondered why there were three MPs of the Golden Dawn there -- Panayotaros,  Lagos, and Pappas -- and no MP from any other party.  Why were there only fanatical religionists, and no defenders of the intellect and of freedom of expression? We made some phone calls to radio stations and journalists, begging them to inform as much of the mass media, and as many politicians, as they could about the situation.

After some time, we went out again. The same pattern repeated every so often. The ring of police formed again.  The police pushed everyone away, except for the MPs who were standing within the ring.  At one point there was a commotion and journalists and cameras approached.  A few MPs from SYRIZA and DIMAR parties had arrived. I believe they were Tatsopoulos, Repousis and Katrivanou.  I also heard that Dritsas was there but I’m not sure -- I don’t know them all by sight.  They made a few statements.  There was some talk of opening the theater so that only the MPs could enter, so that the protesters “wouldn’t get their way”.  “What’s the point of that?” I thought. The point is for the public to enter and the show to go on.  It’s no victory for just the MPs to enter.

Time passed, the situation remained unchanged. I heard that the actors feared -- and rightly, in my opinion -- that if they opened to doors for the public, the religionists would enter with the pretext that they wanted to see the show, and then create problems, in all probability with the Golden Dawn MPs in the front line. So the doors stayed closed.  The protesters did not leave, but neither did we.  Every so often, we asked the police if the show would go on, and their answer was a consistent, “We don’t know yet”. At one point, I saw Ioanna Kurtovik in front of me, speaking to the police:

“Aren't these people disturbing the peace? Why don't you remove them? Why won't you do something?”

I didn’t hear the answer, but I saw what they did, in practice: nothing.

I felt adrift. Initially I wasn’t afraid, but as time went by, there were moments when my courage failed me. I remembered my husband, who’s always worrying that I’ll come across fanatics, that something will happen to me, that I’ll get beat up. I thought of my child, sleeping peacefully at home. What if I really got beat up? What if there were more disturbances and we were all arrested? What if I couldn’t lie in my husband’s embrace tonight? What if I couldn’t be there to wake my child for school? I was tempted to leave -- but I said to myself: No. I won’t allow them to chase me away, I won’t allow them to intimidate me. I will stay here and speak with them for as long as I can and then I’ll take a breather and speak with them again, even if they don’t listen, even if they don’t seem to listen, even if they refuse to listen. If even a single person listens to the things I say, perhaps they will retain something.  If not that person, then maybe someone who happened to hear the conversation. Even if nobody listens to me, I will feel better about myself only if I speak up, only if I stand up to them. Calmly, politely and steadily.

In the meantime, I located some of my friends. At some point, I spotted someone I knew, then another. I started talking to people again, with journalists, with people I knew and people I didn’t, with people who wanted to see the play and with protesters. I struck a conversation with a gentleman who had come to protest the play.

“This play insults Christ.’
“What can I say... I don’t know, I haven’t seen it.”
“I have. I don’t judge something I haven’t seen.”
“Then why do you deprive us the right to see and judge for ourselves?”
“I’m the one stopping you?”
“Well, of course, since you won’t let us see it!”
“How am I not letting you see it? Go and see it.”
“But aren’t you demanding for the play to be banned?”
“Yes, I want it to be banned.”
“Why?”
“Because it insults Christ and the Virgin Mary!”
“Why don’t you describe it to me, so I can know exactly what’s in it.”
“It shows Christ on the cross and twelve Apostles dancing.  It showed Judas with Christ, that Judas had an affair with Christ.  It speaks of affairs between men.  It shows the Virgin Mary pregnant and about to deliver.  A man plays Mary.  They ask her, ‘Where’s your husband’ and she says, ‘He’s parking the car’...”
“It’s a different perspective on Christ and the Virgin Mary, just not yours.”
“It’s a blasphemous play! It blasphemes against my faith!”
“And why shouldn’t it?”

Right then, he became confused. Up to that point, he was calm and talkative. Then he tensed up.

“What are you saying? Why shouldn’t it blaspheme? How can you ask why?”
“Blasphemy is the questioning of dogma. If you don’t want to question it, that’s fine. Why shouldn’t someone else question it? You believe, I don’t. Why shouldn’t I question it?”
“You mean you don’t believe in God?”
“No.”
“Then we cannot talk! We don’t believe the same things!”

He turned his back and strided away.

“We don’t believe the same things, but we can still talk!”
“No. we can’t!”
“We must be able to talk! We’re fellow beings, fellow citizens, we live in the same country, the same planet. We must be able to talk to each other!”

And yet we couldn’t.

More people, more opinions.

“Why do you swear against our Christ? Do you want us to call your mothers names?”
“I’m not calling anybody names. I just want to see the play.”
“The play swears against our Christ. Do you want me to produce a play calling your mother names?”
“My mother, like yours, is a real person. Christ and the Virgin Mary are ideas and exist only in your head.”
“What are you saying! Christ is my brother!”
“Your brother is one thing, Christ is another. One is a human being, the other, a belief. It’s one thing insulting your family, and another, your beliefs.”
“Tell me, would you like me to insult your beliefs?”
“Be my guest! Make as much fun of them as you want!”
“Is that so? Why don’t you try cursing Mohammed in front of Muslims and see what they’ll do to you?”
“And that means you have the right to do the very same thing to me?”

Nada, dead end.

At least some of them were speaking to me. Some would even listen, like the man who was watching me speak to those Christian maniacs that used the foulest of language.I turned to him and asked,

“Do you believe in God?”
“Yes.”
“Look at these people. Do you think that right now they're being inspired by the spirit of God?”

I asked the same question of the priests who were there with crosses in their hands.  They, at least, weren’t cursing or threatening, but they made no attempt to restrain their flock.

“You are a priest. Please tell me, do you approve of what's happening here? Do you approve of this behavior? What are you doing to prevent it?”

Silence, complete indifference.

Most disheartening of all, though, more than the insults and the threats and shoving, were the suggestions of police officers, the journalists, the people who had come to see the play, the few protesters who were trying to calm things down, and even a passer-by:

“Let it go, better let it go.”
“Go away, step back, let them be.”
“Don’t you get it? Let them be. Don’t you see what’s going on?”
“Let them be, child, they can’t be reasoned with.”
“ Leave, let it go. Leave. Let it go.”

They took me by the hand and softly tried to pull me away. They offered friendly, protective smiles.

No, I won’t leave, I won’t let it go. I have a right to be here. I have a right to a different opinion. I have the right to see a play of my choosing. I have the right to do all this, even if some people feel offended, even if some are annoyed, even if they try to push me away by force, having exhausted all legal means, since the charges against the producers were deemed baseless and the restraining order illegal. And I will exercise my right and will not allow violence and bullying discourage me.

If I let it go, if I step back, they will take up the space I leave and advance a bit more. If take a step back, they will feel a bit stronger and will feel their actions are  justified. If I leave, they will stay and spread out, so there’s no more room for me. If I don’t stay put now, at some point I won’t be able to leave my home, and sooner or later they will reach into my own home.

That is why I mean to stay. I will be myself, with my views, in my land. I am not leaving.

I am who I am; and I am here.

To stay.


Greek version of the article

Translated by toomanytribbles and EvanT

Δευτέρα 18 Οκτωβρίου 2010

Are we free to choose our religious beliefs?

The original article was published on november 9, 2009.

For the greek version, click here.

As I read the recent publications and follow conversations in blogs and fora concerning the decision of the European Court for Human Rights to abolish crucifixes from the school rooms of Italy, I reflect on the difficulty of seeing the obvious: that the presence of religious symbols reflects partiality in favor of a particular religion, and what is more, it is a declaration of power, an indirect imposition, and therefore it limits the citizens’ freedom, regarding both the choice and the expression of their religious beliefs.

ll of us know of people who have sworn in court with their hand placed on the bible, simply in order not to risk displeasing a possibly religious judge. How free can we feel to declare that we are not christian, in a country were christian symbols reign?

How can a child choose whether to join a religion or not, and if yes, which religion that would be, while the crucifix is still hanging over the blackboard? How easy do you think it is to take a posture against the prevalent belief of society? How can nobody realize that the symbols and rituals of a religion (crucifix, icons, prayers, etc), when displayed in places where all citizens must go in order to fulfill their obligations or claim their rights (schools, courts of justice, police, army, public services), represent an imposition of that religion?

Oh but of course, it is not forbidden to belong to another religion or to have no religion. Let someone please go tell this to my daughter, who makes the sign of the cross during the morning prayer in the school yard, because all children do so, in spite of the fact that we are not christians and she has not been taught christian customs and traditions. Apparently nobody has ever taught her to, neither has anybody imposed this on her. She could of course go to the empty classroom on her own and wait for the others to finish, or stand apart, alone, next to the others, without crossing herself. I ask you to imagine a six year old, on first grade, in a new place, among new people, with new responsibilities, trying to adapt to a new situation, and on top of that having to make a statement about her religious beliefs – let’s face it, failure to participate in a christian ritual such as the prayer is an ideological statement. How can we possibly demand of young children to take such a grave ideological decision and assume its weight, either crossing themselves or not?

I would like to tell those christians who feel that their faith is being threatened, that they ought to be glad at the prospect of symbol removal from schools. Will the display of religious symbols make good christians out of the children? Probably the opposite is true: it will teach them to pretend, like my daughter does now, in order to be integrated. The essence of faith can not be taught by pure formalism of ritual. Those who truly care for christian faith will want the abolition not only of symbols and prayer from the schools, but also of the christian catechism euphemistically called “religion class”.

And all us fools, citizens of this country, divide into “christians” and “others” and fight over the display or removal of “their” symbol, instead of realizing that this symbol is a Damocles’ sword hanging over the heads of us ALL.

Let us all together turn our home into a FREE country, where nobody will need to cross themselves unwittingly, nor swear hypocritically, in order to feel socially integrated.

UPDATE: Following the example of mrs. Lauci in Italy, eight parents in Greece have sent petitions to the Greek Ombudsman asking for the removal of religious symbols and the abolition of prayer from their children’s school. Also, the Humanist Union of Greece has sent an open letter to the prime minister on the subject of the removal o f religious symbols.

Σάββατο 16 Οκτωβρίου 2010

ENGLISH ARTICLES

Recently, the blog Atheia, a collective blog posting articles of atheistic interest to which I sometimes contribute, has decided to translate a few of the articles in english. Since the blog Atheia does not permite comments but redirects to the authors' blog for commenting, it was necessary to post our translated articles in our respective blogs in order to allow for comments.

The purpose of this post is to contain the links to all the english translations of my articles. I considered creating a new blog, but the articles are so few, I figured it was not worth it. I will be adding more articles as I translate them.

You are welcome to read my posts and comment. If you find them interesting, you might want to visit the Atheia blog and read more, in case you have not already done it, or visit the Atheist Union of Greece webpage.

Article links:

1. Are we free to choose our religious beliefs?

Why “Atheia” ?

This article was translated for the english version of the collective atheist blog "Atheia".
The original article, written for the greek version of the blog Atheia, was posted on April 6, 2009. For the greek version of the article, click here.

When we decided to launch a collective blog with an atheistic content, we sought a title. We concluded that most contributors did not define themselves as atheists, but free-thinkers, skeptics or secularists and viewed atheia as a result of their logical approach of the cosmos, a part of a more general philosophy or ideology. Indeed, the term "atheia" wouldn’t even exist, if its opposite, belief in god, didn’t exist. So why bother with something that doesn’t exist? Why bother publicly declaring that we do not believe in the existence of god?

So, why talk of atheia?

Why not, logic, for instance? Most, if not all of us, use logic as an everyday tool to interpret the phenomena we observe and check the validity of every argument.

Why not skepticism? Our basic characteristics are doubting, studying, checking, not accepting axioms at face value nor do we believe that there is anything that should not be doubted.

Why not materialism? It considers the natural world definitive, primary, the very foundation of existence and conscience, thought and spirit are considered secondary.

We could even mention nihilism, which rejects absolute knowledge, truth and ethics, in contrast to religion, which lays claim on all three.

On a practical level, we all strive for secularism; dividing the spiritual life (whether it goes by the name "religion" or any other name) from politics, education, economy and all areas of secular activity.

And there is no doubt we’re all free-thinkers. We let our minds operated free of all presuppositions, prejudices and superstitions, free from prefabricated beliefs and doctrines. For he who thinks freely, thinks well.

For those of us contributing to this blog, all the previous points are valid. But neither was the cause that sparked the creation of this collective website. Our common denominator, the issue we all care about and want to discuss and express in any way we think of is atheia.

In a world where everyone would be able to think freely and choose her religious views without interference, there would be no reason to talk of atheia. But in a world where religion is more than a simple institution, where religion is above doubt and criticism, where the presence and influence of religion can be traced in society and politics, where religion has special financial advantages, where religious doctrine is taught in public schools and manifest in our every step, from the crucifix behind the podium to the bible on the witness stand, in a world like this an atheist is compelled to share his ideals.

It needs to be more widely know that there is an alternative. That religion is not something necessary nor should we take it for granted in our lives. That someone can live just fine without it. That not only does the atheist miss something, but gains greater freedom both spiritually and in his everyday life.

For many atheia is a word of negative connotations. It is linked to immorality, as if morality is a religious monopoly, or hatred, as if rejecting a belief automatically makes one hate those who accept it.

For us atheia is only positive. It releases the spirit from the constraints of undoubting faith, it rids the mind of metaphysical though and turns the exploration of the world into an objective matter, it brings us face to face with the responsibility of our actions, it gives us the ability to build a society based on man and nature.

We chose to talk of atheia and not atheism. "Atheism" is defined in dictionaries and encyclopaedias, whether we like it or not, as the denial of god (which assumes that god exists and we deny it). Furthermore, the ending of the word "atheism" suggests an ideology, while "atheia" is not an ideology. It is not a system of beliefs, it is not an finely woven net of ideas.

The greek word "atheia" defines the lack of belief in god and in the supernatural.

No more, no less

After many suggestions as to what the name of our collective website should be, after many discussions online and offline, after considering logic, skepticism, secularism and free-thought and agreeing that while all of these concepts express us, but none is our focal point, we finally settled on the name you see: ATHEIA.